Why the Green New Deal Includes a Jobs Guarantee

Pavlina Tcherneva, one of the economists behind the idea, explains how it can fight the climate crisis and promote economic stability for American

Visit https://therealnews.com for more stories and help support our work by donating at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

21 thoughts on “Why the Green New Deal Includes a Jobs Guarantee

  1. Instead of 1000's of people loosing jobs why not create jobs while mining Helium 3 and implementing Lifi lighting — lights that provide internet

  2. Oh millions of jobs huh created jobs working for the government that nobody trusts and also turn all your guns into the government that nobody trusts smart smart somebody call Stalin because apparently he’s still breathing

  3. The njfac.org says that 15.6 million are unemployed and need jobs, 9.3% of an enlarged workforce (April 2019 report). At $15 an hour to employ all would cost $468 billion, about the price of Medicaid, which is $579 billion in 2018. The $468 billion is also 3% of the national income. Consider, employing about 9% of the poorest for 3% of the national income is a deal, and moreover it benefits all with the product they produce, in this case housing insulation, solar and wind power, a reduction in GHGases. Of course, no one listens. Thank you for Tcherneva's interview. See or read more of her work at https://www.pavlina-tcherneva.net web page.

  4. How the hell do you guarantee people jobs?…So what if someone doesn't perform or show up? Can you fire that person or do they just get placed in a new guaranteed job? How do you ensure a livable wage? What if the revenue is not there? There are so many problems with this. It lacks logic. You know who would be holding the bag for this? Us, the tax payers. It's not my responsibility to ensure someone else has a job. As an economist you think she would know this. I'm so disgusted with the entitlement mindset of my generation. No one owes anyone anything in this life.

  5. It'd be rather necessary to have views from scientific experts about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's ideas regarding climate change, for economics has nothing to do with this sort of topic, except in terms of economic costs. Don't expect economists to be otherwise able to give a reliable view about climate. People also should never forget that CC is definitely not new for this planet. It's happened many times since the earliest existence of this planet. Take the various "ice ages", their beginnings and endings, f.e. Those weren't at all related to activity of any humans or any other animals. The tricky thing today is how much are humans responsible for current CC, and also, using scientific and not business analysis, how much real CC is there today, for it apparently varies across this planet. I'm not convinced about CC, all while recognizing some real difference(s) between the 1960s and today, for where I've resided, that is; for, I can't say much more than that, except that I believe that there're far more pressing issues to be concerned about, such as the totally criminal wars lead by Washington, the extreme crimes of Israel, ….. Of course there're also pressing issues nationally, such as discrimination, bogus laws, criminal law enforcement, spying on all Americans, etc., f.e.

  6. Environmentalism is kinda seen as a "luxury good" by too many of us. Climate problems are really bad for overall economic development though. The two problems exacerbate each other so the prospect of an effective solution that tackles both at once is exciting. How much has it changed from the form that was in the GP platform? I think it's a great idea that needs work.

  7. The GND proposes installation of 5G, which would enable Technocracy:
    “The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.” ~ Zbigniew Brzezinski’s book, Between Two Ages, 1970

    5G is designed to usher in TECHNOCRACY, similar to the social credit system in China. Data is the new oil. Surveillance capitalism is real, look it up. Even the GND (green new deal) proposes installation of “smart” grids, which is a disastrous swap of fossil fuel pollution for cancerous electrosmog.

    The Technocracy agenda, which began in the 1930's, is trying to piggy back onto a very good idea, to improve the health of the public sector with a strong fiscal policy investment. But green energy solutions need to be decoupled from social services so that we can move forward quickly on fixing our healthcare and education crisis while considering a TOTAL BAN ON 5G TECHNOLOGY.

    Pay no attention to the hundreds of birds that fell from the sky recently in the Netherlands due to 5G radiation, insect population decline or the mini cell towers already popping up in 30 US cities WITHOUT OUR CONSENT, many close to school playgrounds. Sterility concerns??

    "Who is demanding a hundred devices in his home that spy on him and record his actions? With 5G, the ultimate goal is: every device in every home that uses energy will be “its own computer,” and the planetary grid will connect ALL these devices to a monitoring and regulating Energy Authority." ~ Jon Rappoport

    Both China and Israel are competing in the worldwide Technocracy 5G "smart grid" installation, creating a real open air prison.

    Don't be a sucker for it.

  8. Good work inviting a mmt non ideologue economist on.

    Cut military spending because its morally right.

    We print our own currency. We afford anything and everything until real capacity is reached.

  9. I am disappointed since they do not have any concrete solutions. I have been pushing the Windyday Concept which would build worker coop factories in all cities for batteries, solar panels, wind & tide turbines, tiny homes, local farms. By implementing this we could start off of fossil fuel by 2020.

  10. Sorry, but solar and wind will be useless in the future during the solar hibernation coming. Only geothermal, coal, gas will heat the world. Climate change is solar based not man. When the sun goes dark, the world goes cold, no food can be grown, mass migration south, tearing down the trump wall. Climatologists only study climate for 2 centuries, so they are not intelligent. Paleo-Climatologists study ice core data going back 800k years, to show the earth spends 90% of the time in freezing glacial conditions at least 30 degrees colder than now. If you believe the earth is warming, you'll freeze to death in your deception.

  11. I don't know if you are aware of it or not but, In the DECEMBER 19, 2018
    edition of the Stanford News Service there is an article that notes: Stanford scientists locate nearly all U.S. solar panels by applying machine learning to a billion satellite images.(This applies to the contiguous 48 states.)

    Stanford researchers have identified the GPS locations and sizes of almost all U.S. solar power installations from a billion images. Using the data, which is public, they identified factors that promote the use of solar energy and those that discourage it.

    BY MARK GOLDEN

    I think the information in this article could make it easier for the "Green New Deal" to determine policy, access this information to help determine where it would be most beneficial, initially, to install panels, create jobs, etc.

  12. O’CRAZYO can’t even add. This earth has been going through devastating changes forEVER! We weren’t even here! Duh. Even Al Gore admitted the Paris Accord was useless. As he flew away in his jet.

Comments are closed.