Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RTWvEsxZ1E&t=227s
Truth Be Told Audits’ channel: https://www.youtube.com/@dtrats2
Sources:
Whren v. United States- https://bit.ly/3gX0kyJ
La. Stat. tit. 32 § 79- https://bit.ly/45WvTyA
State v. Waters- https://bit.ly/40lWnIo
U.S. v. Jerry- https://bit.ly/47cgNWy
U.S. v. Pierre- https://bit.ly/3tX0Ghf
Terry v. Ohio- https://bit.ly/2SFAnK9
Pennsylvania v. Mimms- https://bit.ly/39nFjsF
State v. Hunter- https://bit.ly/46YmfMY
Turner v. Driver- https://bit.ly/44Vw4Kg
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3732- https://bit.ly/46UDU8h
Arizona Broadcasters Association v. Mayes order- https://bit.ly/3tZP9hc
Ind. Code § 35-44.1-2-14- https://bit.ly/47chbV0
Nicodemus v. City of South Bend complaint- https://bit.ly/40mKqSQ
Louisiana HB 85 info- https://bit.ly/3MrJF5g
Louisiana HB 85 text- https://bit.ly/3SIIzWX
Louisiana HB 85 veto letter- https://bit.ly/3Qq0HSj
'Officer safety' is the biggest joke. THEY'RE the ones with the guns.
That old are not there to support the laws they are there to break the laws and abuse those that have no ideas about the laws
The butt hurt police on duty love to break laws not follow them biggest tax paid gang
It's their ego. They always want things to happen the way they want and will even lie yo get what they want. Cause nobody will fire them.
This guy shouldn't be allowed to even work at a strip mall!💯
I wouldn’t have given the guy a A for is level of aggression he was showing off. That interaction probably would have gone way better if he hadn’t been so aggressive from the start. While the cop should have done better he was responding to the drivers aggressive behavior, an being aggressive at the start any conversation is never going to end well.
No film was used! lol. Phones are digital.
I the Holmes vs Florida,,, a female officer noticed an unusually large bulge in Mr. Holmes pants, after further investigation it was declared that Mr. Holmes was packing a 14" Penis,, this was declared an unlawful search, because state statue clearly states a large bulge in a males groin area alone does not constitute a pat down,,, 😂😜✌️🇺🇲✊️🗽⚖️
Power tripping insane imagine what went on before cameras
stupid over the top rubbish
It’s a big gang. Very steeped in racism and even religious zealotry. It’s funny when I see black cops wear it.
It's really messed up that officers take whatever actions they feel like and it's up to the citizens to know exactly what they are and are not allowed to do OR they have to let themselves get violated.
The driver told the officer, "I am your worst nightmare." That would be cause to believe he was dangerous. Interesting that the narrator fails to mention this.
Bottom line: Keep purposely making law enforcement work hard for policemen and soon there won’t be anyone willing to take up such a profession. Then what will you all do?
8:40
While the cop is an ass, the auditor said "I'm your worst nightmare" and then refused to declare whether they had weapons. While it is flimsy, this does present a possibility that not only is the auditor armed but could be planning on acting violently. IMO, while much of this interaction so far is inappropriate, a simple pat down to confirm that the auditor is speaking only of legal and verbal responses instead of violent physical responses can be justified… even if it's a flimsy ghost of a threat, the officer had the prerogative to interpret "im your worst nightmare" as a physical threat.
I would drop a half a letter from the grade for the incorrect punctuation of the onscreen remarks. 😂
End Qualified Immunity.
My friend came back from fighting in Israel. He said the cop should go there and see what the real world looks like nit this nonsense about weaving.
so question…Arizona says filming within 8 feet of the officers location is too close, but what if it's your incident? does that differ?
It is impossible to drive a car straight as an arrow.. we are not machines but it does give cops a right to make his department a lot of money on bogus bs!! Just like holding 55 at turns, curves, uphill and downhill.. that's why they give 3-5 mph leeway
I guess for many cops is so hard ( EGO ) accepting another citizen know more about laws compared to with them , the fact they are Law enforcement officers DONT know the law and basic civil rights is dangerous and expensive for taxpayers in my opinion , not for cops because not many times they face consequences for the simple facts they wrong doings normally are dismissed for NOT wrong doing found after being investigated for the same department in my opinion, when a department OUTSIDE of PD take this investigations agains cops in my opinion is when all this abuse of power can be ended.
Its INSANE to me, that we have to recite Case law, in order to protect ourselves from things that are obviously immoral.
Aaaand the laaaaand of the Freeeeeee…
And hooooome, of theeeeee braaaaaaaave ❤🇺🇸
🤔❓️
Filming is a danger to him? 😂
Big pot leaf on his notebook
Silly and misleading title. The brownie officer was just as bad as the snowflake
WOW!
Americans are so lucky.
You are SO free.
That is one powerful Constitution you got there. It was completely violated in numerous ways in this video and that cop is still on duty, unreprimanded and unconcerned. He has qualified immunity. (Who the hell thought that one up, Jesus Christ!).
If an officer in my country behaved that way, it would be his first and last chance, he'd be immediately fired and never allowed to serve again. See, in my country, officers swear on a document that they will not only maintain moral actions in all of their conduct, on the job, or not, but are also expected to exceed ordinary morality and behave as professionals at all times. Violate that and you can and often are fired without warning. Your cops make an oath to a Constitution they violate every chance they get.
And what do you do? You make videos.
I mean, holy shit, we let these people walk around with guns, of course they need to be in control 100% of the time.
You people are a joke. Freest Country on earth?
Anyone else on the floor having a good belly laugh?
America is NOT a State, it is a state of mind. You are not a free people. Does it make you feel better to lie about it?
"America, FUCK YEAH! We're Number One!"
I hate these rude asses
Mr Rullus is just anti authority and this channel hates law and order. One day you’ll get the world you want to live in and savages will make you appreciate what you helped to destroy
Nice to see police officers in great physical and mental shape for a change…. Oh wait…
Sovereign citizens believe they are not under jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent.
This dude is an idiot.
This is all so petty. Go protect someone
I would give him, more of a B+. He could have been more aggressive towards his partner. I think he wanted to hold back, let the officer in the investigation to sink in his stupidity