Verdict reached in Trump defamation trial

Verdict reached in Trump defamation trial

A verdict has been reached in the Trump defamation trial. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, talks to the media after the verdict was annouced.

Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! https://www.youtube.com/livenowfox?sub_confirmation=1
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: https://www.livenowfox.com/
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: https://twitter.com/livenowfox

Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXPIikRWt-k

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

31 thoughts on “Verdict reached in Trump defamation trial

  1. ALINA WAS CRYING 😂 I LOVE HER BUT SHE NEEDS STRESS LESS RELAX ALINA DONT CRY NW SHE WAS PROBABLY CRYING BECAUSE THOUGHTS OF GOING JAIL OTHER WOMEN READY TO DEAL WITH HER INSIDE JAIL 😂 IM ONLY JOKING ALINA RELAX DW GO WITH THE FLOW AND KEEP THAT PASSION SAME TIME

  2. It just seems funny that 'a self appraised Gazillionaire' BEGS for money from people that can barely afford groceries to pay for his legal fees for growing list of crimes that he has committed, and has to employ DIPSTICK legal representation like BARBIE because NO REPUTABLE legal firm will represent him, and yet the CULT still do not work out that "the orange muppet' is 'taking them to the bank' for the suckers that they are. God help America … 😀😀😀

  3. Regardless of whether you are Republican or Democrat, the ruling against Trump was lawful and judged on by a jury of his peers. Habba's diatribe against the Judge, the jury and the legal system was not only contemptuous but factually and legally wrong. She was stating to the press that evidence and experts could not be submitted to the court. What she failed to state was that these experts and evidence were an attempt to open up an already ruled judgement which she clearly could not do and this case was nothing to do with that. This was utter ineptness by Habba. Her twisted version of why the judge wanting to know what questions she was going to ask was again because of her ineptness and lack of following the rules. Trump's huge loss was in part due to Habba's abysmal lack of credibility and failure to control her client who not only showed contempt in court but showed to the jury that he did indeed was a malicious person. He effectively handed his own ass to the jury.

  4. More the democratic the system is, the more severe the punishments when you persistently lie under oath. Has nothing to do with which party you belong to. That's why both the plaintiff and the defendant has the right to provide evidence but if those evidence is not convincing to the jury, then you lose, simple as that. Neither the judge nor the jury nor the lawyers have absolute authority, this check and balance was built into the system. Let this be a warning to all those public officials that has and is persistently lying and misleading the public.

Leave a Reply