FED UP Judge Prepares to LAY TRUMP OUT in Criminal Trial

Michael Popok and Karen Friedman Agnifilo discuss and debate on the Legal AF podcast: whether Judge Merchan will disqualify himself from presiding over the Trump criminal trial set to start on 4/15 and whether he will find Trump in criminal contempt and throw him in jail.

Visit https://meidastouch.com for more!

Support the MeidasTouch Network: https://patreon.com/meidastouch
Add the MeidasTouch Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-meidastouch-podcast/id1510240831
Buy MeidasTouch Merch: https://store.meidastouch.com

Follow MeidasTouch on Twitter: https://twitter.com/meidastouch
Follow MeidasTouch on Facebook: https://facebook.com/meidastouch
Follow MeidasTouch on Instagram: https://instagram.com/meidastouch
Follow MeidasTouch on TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@meidastouch

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

30 thoughts on “FED UP Judge Prepares to LAY TRUMP OUT in Criminal Trial

  1. I hate to say it because I’d love to see Trump placed in pre-trial detention, but if the judge wants to guarantee the US Supreme Court inserts itself into these proceedings then that’s the way to do it.

  2. Nice Art, G&R! Sad we have to live through this guy. I hope one day, the historians talk about how shows like this helped us save our democracy!

  3. Trump's lawyers are aiding and abetting otherwise he wouldn't have known to make these moves. All his lawyers should be disbarred for having behaved retangedly with the court.

  4. How about Loose Cannon that was APPOINTED by you know who, presiding over the Mal a Lardgo espionage, etc., case!!! CONFLICT OF INTEREST ? IT APPEARS THERE IS just via association !

  5. So let me get this right… his 'right to defend himself against political attacks' is more important than the court's obligation to protect the integrity of the trial and the safety of the witnesses? Mkay… but isn't being involved in politics voluntary? So he doesn't HAVE to subject himself to political attacks. I have never been attacked politically, so would I be able to ask the court to let me lie and threaten people involved in any criminal cases against me?

    I am just so done with this garbage. The one thing that I have always thought about Trump is that at least he has highlighted a LOT of places in our government and justice system that MUST be addressed for us to have any confidence in it again.

Comments are closed.