As Resistance Halts Pipelines, LNG and Tar Sands Move via Rail

The Trump administration is considering a proposal to move fracked gas by rail at the behest of a company owned by Milwaukee Bucks billionaire owner Wes Edens, a major donor to the DNC. As tar sands pipelines are halted, more carbon-intensive crude moves along the tracks.

Producer: Dimitri Lascaris
Steve Horn
Director: Bababtunde Ogunfolaju
Audio Engineer: Adam Coley
Research: Steve Horn

Subscribe to our page and support our work at https://therealnews.com/donate.

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

29 thoughts on “As Resistance Halts Pipelines, LNG and Tar Sands Move via Rail

  1. You don't see LNG pipelines because you don't have to liquify it to put it in a pipe. It's a gas, it flows real nice. Good job glossing over and dancing around facts that are not convenient for your argument. You are doing a disservice to your cause by misleading the sheep.

  2. Higher temperature rated steel for rails? Please. Check the strength of pearlitic steel for rails at 23 C and 75 C. Not a strength issue and very misleading. All they will do is leave a bigger gap between rails.

  3. These guys are blathering idiots.
    They are spewing out baseless rhetoric in order to make money off of YouTube.
    Get a real job!

  4. Oh, wait, Trump made the proposal, but a DNC donor is investing. Gee, “resistance” or bipartisan support? Watch how the voting goes, but I bet it passes. Probably while we’re all distracted by !Russia! 2.0.

  5. Debabrata Banerjee: Unlike single skin rail road oil tanks, rail road LNG tanks are double skin & vacuum insulated like a thermos flask. Europe has been using these successfully not only in railroads but also as long distance road tankers in their distribution system. It should be noted that both US & Canada uses these LNG tanks as road tankers for distribution to users. Ports in Europe have done extensive risk analysis on navigation of LNG carrying ships or ships powered by LNG in port vicinity & each ship has to adhere to its own specific safety proceedure.
    The question is political will to technically solve & evolve appropriate safety standard & institute the regulatory decipline.

  6. Do you notice how nobody is paying attention to the climate change which is happening. No country has slowed down the search for oil and gas and obviously care very little about the future. The future is just fucked because no one will make the first move.

  7. I recall first reading about one of the multiple fatality oil by rail disasters on WikiNews.org which surprised me that it had not been in my local newspaper, despite its seriousness!

  8. Very fine interview, and I appreciated Justin making reference to the BAD rail oil accident that occurred in Lac-Mégantic, formerly called only Mégantic, but not Lac or Lake Mégantic, which is only for the lake there (need to use the hyphen for the town). Disambiguation page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A9gantic. 2013 train derailment page is linked, but I'll include the link at the end of this comment. I knew it occurred during recent years but wouldn't have thought it was as far back as 2013. I reside in an eastern or central eastern area of the Eastern Townships of Quebec, Sherbrooke, so definitely learned of this very NASTY train derailment. Didn't get an opportunity to visit though, not when this incident happened. Haven't been to Lac-Mégantic for a LONG time. Based on what I read about it, re. the damage caused, it definitely would've been interesting to visit at that time. If I remember correctly, then either all or certainly much of the downtown or center of town was badly affected. There was news reporting about this, but it seemed to cease fairly quickly. Well, maybe it's just that I haven't used tv for far longer and don't get newspapers. But, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lac-M%C3%A9gantic_rail_disaster. Half of the center of town was wiped out and most of the rest had to be demolished due to petroleum contamination. NASTY!

  9. There is a propane shortage for drying grains. Is it possible to substitute liquid natural gas in some way to assist farmers in the drying of grains?

  10. LNG ships were outlawed in Los Angeles and Long Beach harbors in the 1970s as there are no legitimate safety protections that can be made.

  11. LNG is a hazardous substance as it is but attempting to transport by rail can cause a catastrophic chain reaction of destruction at a massive level! but that's 45 for ya.

  12. people like Donald Trump with His associates and partners and supporters must be discredited and defeated – twitter prevents you from examining the activities of @maxrafaelwaller and @mrwaller3 who are Socratic GadFlies – written at 4:58 am Pacific Standard Time on Tuesday, 3 December 2019

Comments are closed.