These Cops LOSE IT Over A Simple Question

Go to https://buyraycon.com/audit for 15% off your order! Brought to you by Raycon.

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XnXB6ckzIo

Auditing America’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/AuditingAmerica

Sources:

Information on Capitol Building and Capitol Police-
https://bit.ly/3ybmRzM
https://bit.ly/3RqUIeI
https://bit.ly/3SQANXz
https://bit.ly/3M9Fgm7
https://bit.ly/3fwQTXX

Ga. Code § 35-2-121- https://bit.ly/3STnXrw

Ga. Code § 50-16-14- https://bit.ly/3V16QWT

Ga. Code § 50-9-9- https://bit.ly/3Sqsu53

Ga. Code § 35-2-122- https://bit.ly/3CsMsGI

Ga. Code § 50-16-16- https://bit.ly/3UV5DjI

Ga. Code § 16-10-24- https://bit.ly/3UWjMx8

Edmonds v. City of Albany- https://bit.ly/3SzOSZJ

Supremacy Clause- https://bit.ly/3C1JRlD

Constitution; Article VI- https://bit.ly/3C4aIxA

Marbury v. Madison- https://bit.ly/3rt2Ocg

Chandler v. Miller- https://bit.ly/3CvBDE2

City of Indianapolis v. Edmond- https://bit.ly/3rpswOz

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

30 thoughts on “These Cops LOSE IT Over A Simple Question

  1. NOTHING HAPPENED ON THE 6th! I am a USA loving right wing christian conservative.I KNOW MY PEOPLE We don't DO anything. We might make unfriendly comments on YouTube videos. We'll complain all day to our family and friends. Weiner laptop? NOTHING Public School boards going insane? NOTHING! RUBY RIDGE?? NOTHING! The destruction of an entire economy over a virus? NOTHING! Why? Because those of us on the right are chickenshit. We'll let the American left put us into box cars and take us all away just like the Nazis did with the Jews and out of fear of nothing more than getting yelled at, we'll comply. January 6th would have required planning. The American right doesn't do that. It would have required getting off the couch. The American right doesn't do that. It would require a certain amount of unity between two or more people and everybody in the United States knows damn good and well the American right cannot do that! IF anything happened it wasn't perpetrated by a bunch of America loving law abiding right-wingers

  2. SUPREMACY CLAUSE
    Consider whether or not the signers of the Constitution would agree or disagree with any law or ordinance.

  3. Wow, I’ve watched a lot of these and I’ve seen a lot of egos. This is an all time ego. A picture of this guy should be in the dictionary right next to the word. Holy smokes.😮

  4. This guy is a psychopath and clearly needs to be evaluated WEEKLY! His ego has grown beyond control and needs to be addressed IMMEDIATELY!

  5. Im going to have to dissagree with this one. It's a public taxpayer funded building. Absent a crime, they have no right to demand ID or deny them access to a public place.

  6. i didnt know curly neal of the globetrotters was now a potsmokin cop with attitude. This jackass is dangerous and obviously just wants to rip someones head off for shtZ and giggles.

  7. You do not have to show ID to enter a public building. The Capital building belongs to the PEOPLE. WE do not have to show ID to enter it. Federal law does NOT trump state laws. All they had to do was claim to be protesting and they would have had no issue.

  8. To be fair we dont know how they acted before the camera came on, they could have real a-holes and thats why the trooper took that tone. Its still best to stay professional tho

  9. He is firm, but he's not particularly rude or aggressive. And given the cuts in the video, we do not know how the "auditors" were behaving. You say that the auditors begin to film when they were asked for ID, but I get the impression the video starts later. They are already passing the desk, as if they ignored the request for ID and just continued going in.

  10. I went to the Nebraska State Capital Building. My wife was taking a tour for her job. I wandered around and ended up on the 4th floor where I found a small office called the Sorghum board. I happen to love Sorghum so I walked in. I walked out with a bunch of nifty little trinkets. Stickers, keychain pressure gauge, and a pocket knife! Just a little penknife, I carry much larger everyday, but I walked in had a chat, was armed by the State, and left with a good story. Nebraska is awesome.

  11. Your refusal to call these frauditors out for the absolute clowns They are is disturbing at best. That security officer deserves an a plus because he treated them clowns exactly the way they should have been treated like the pests and instigators that they truly are. On the other hand those two frauditors deserved an f minus for their absolute misunderstanding of the reach of their constitutional rights. You so badly want to take the side of an auditor that you absolutely excuse. Their absolute lack of understanding and intelligence in a situation, rather than call them out For their juvenile antics. These two clowns go into buildings with no other intent other than to disrupt for clicks and views for their youtube channel.

    Maybe the officer would have treated them a little better had he had probably not had so much previous interactions with clowns such as Them in the past.

Comments are closed.