Father and Son Force Cops to Give Up and Leave

21 thoughts on “Father and Son Force Cops to Give Up and Leave”

1. Thanks for joining us! Watch to the end if you have the attention span for it! It helps the channel grow and it helps you be more informed!

   EDIT: I generally try to avoid making an edit like this, but after reviewing the comments I think it is important to remind everyone that I do not make these laws. If you disagree with the way our legal system is structured then we probably have a lot in common in that regard. The point of AtA is to help citizens understand the legal system as it is currently interpreted. Often times, I wholly disagree with how the legislation and laws are structured, but again, the point is to showcase the law, not advocate for it to be changed. The moment this channel begins casting dissent on any particular law, it introduces political bias and ruins the objectivity and appeal of the show. You are free to disagree with how the content is presented, and I understand that this channel is not for everyone, but please be socially responsible and consider the fact that this channel is only reporting on the law, not making it. Channel your emotions regarding the law somewhere productive, such as at the voting booth or your next city council meeting. It is up to all of us to change the things about our justice system that we don't agree with. Hope this helped clarify a few thing. Have a great day!

   EDIT 2: I stand by the grade I gave the officers considering the totality of the circumstances, however, I will admit that I should have chosen better phrasing to describe the officer's demeanor. One of the three officers involved was not necessarily "cordial". Officers do not generally get an F if there is some legal merit to their actions, and ultimately no one was arrested and the department accepted his complaint. If they had arrested Mr. Gutterman or done something to dramatically impair his quality of life in that interaction, then their grade would have been different. We have to reserve the F for those officers who commit blatant acts of maleficence to the detriment of others. As mentioned in the episode, there is some legal ambiguity involved in this encounter regarding the legality of the officer's conduct, and we must weigh those possibilities as evenly as we do the considerations of civilian rights. One last thing to mentions is that the grading section is designed to spark debate, disagreement, and perspective. If you disagree with the grades, that's normal. That is encouraged. But it is not an excuse to cast judgement and be hateful.

2. Hell yeah 🎉

3. So this channel is a business

4. So basically, you put a price on your merchandise to pay for a lawsuit.

5. First you don't sneak up behind someone then you said he is talking to the lady but then he butted in and started talking so is it you aren't speaking to him or you are 😮

6. Cordial and professional?

7. That girl officer has ZERO CLUE you can tell. She prob slept with more than a few guys to get that job. Lol she couldn’t arrest a puppy dog

8. These frauditors doesn't know the law

9. UPDATE…
   So I heard, That female cop is currently working at a fast food, cleaning toilets.
   The male cop, has been seen selling flowers at the airport……(with flowers in his hair).

10. That 2nd cop that come up was a tyrant he was very unprofessional soon as he walked up.

11. breaking the law doesnt make you a victim,its makes you an inmate,yall keep it up and see how that works out for ya

12. They violated there rights by the
    Female officer for insinuated the trust pass she cannot do that that's a civil rights violations

13. That's called buckle and bounce

14. The property of another. Public property is not the property of another

15. audit the audit boot licking like always

16. Frauditor jason gets an F bringing his daughter with him

17. Perhaps these auditors must know the law, everyone can be misinformed and could result in an arrest. We hall must know the law in different states. I learned that state booze stores in Idaho have certain laws. Not all state run booze stores are the same.

18. Her things are big from grabbing everyone's id 🪪 lol

19. The cops get an "C"…no and F…and they were aggressive and condescending especially the female Karen cop.

20. I’ve never heard of a state requiring you to turn over ID because someone wants you trespassed. Normally unless you refused to leave private property or returned after being asked to leave would that apply.

21. This analysis is flawed; it evaluates this situation vis-a-vis the FREE SPEECH portion of 1A. Mr G was not exercising that- in fact he said specifically he wasn't even talking to people he was videoing. Nor was he holding signs or performing other acts to which the FREE SPEECH apply. Forums, and the rulings you cite, are not pertinent. Instead, he was exercising the right to free Press, part of 1A, but not the same; other court rulings would apply, not the ones cited.

    You do a much better analysis than could I, but on the surface, it seems courts generally side with journalist' rights to observe government officials ,and agencies. Courts seen to give wide berth to this right , and based on that, I suspect Mr G gets an "A".

    Also I dispute you characterizing these two cops as "cordial".

    wanker cop #2 says twice "YOU'RE TALKING TO HER" then interrupts their discussion , of course, siding with his blue line gang member. Cop #2 was a jackhole , and probably still is.

    COP #1 showed up with preconceived and ill-informed opinions of guilt , and the elements of a trespass. And she made no attempt to get a supervisor. Both get an "F", IMHO.

Comments are closed.