A Former Cop Challenged These Reckless Police Officers

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhL7lY60h0g

Real World Police’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChaEeYV0iibwFqrmFYTweVA

Sources:

United States v. Landeros- https://bit.ly/3vWc5tD

Brown v. Texas- https://bit.ly/3p1SKDr

Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada- https://bit.ly/3nYdxIV

Nighttime Glare and Driving Performance (NHTSA)- https://bit.ly/3AdF51M

Fla. Stat. § 316.233- https://bit.ly/3rUhznM

Fla. Stat. § 843.08- https://bit.ly/3fyEr7c

United States v. Alvarez- https://bit.ly/3yr9QQD

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

30 thoughts on “A Former Cop Challenged These Reckless Police Officers

  1. I have to say that I have a massive amount of respect for the driver and his passengers, and I think cops like the ones who pulled this man over should have to face some kind of consequences for bogus stops.

  2. He shined his flashlight into a moving vehicle to look for targets. He's targeting colored people, plain and simple.

  3. I think that officer should have received a much lower grade. Blinding on coming traffic, demanding passenger's IDs and lying about the vehicle speed. To me it seems like a D- at best!!

  4. I used to be a Police Officer, and its complete bullshit that this guy estimated speed while theyre driving towards each other IN THE DARK 😂😅. Give me a break

  5. Couldn't be that the cop saw black men in the car and initiated the stop based on their race, right? Nah. Cops never do that.

  6. The cop was interested in how he transferred laterally, not if he was a real cop. His line of questioning shows this. The cop was apparently interested in perhaps making such a transfer himself. The light in the eyes was not cool.

  7. Orlando Police get a "D-" b/c illogical seems to be fine but add to it the blinding of a driver. Illogical activities by police is all fine
    and dandy in their world whereas LIES can be written into their Police Report yet they are rarely, if ever, charged for "PERJURY"!?
    THe Da & Police are both Public Servants that act only against the people for laws they are not held to account for……
    We see this all the time & it must STOP…. peace

  8. Yep in Texas, passengers are not required to show any ID unless in commission of a crime. Also cannot be stopped at random and ID’d due to the fact there is a law against stop and identify unless you are committing a crime. Honestly, even as a current officer I wouldn’t say a word if someone didn’t want to identify in a traffic stop but then again I wouldn’t ask. Cop obviously had a hard on to take someone to jail based off of their looks 🤦🏻‍♂️

  9. You get a damn F. Illegal stops where they have to blatantly lie to make the stop, violating multiple rights from the very start, don't deserve anything more than an F, let alone a C-. Blinding people, causing a safety risk before the stop, makes things worse. With your way better than deserved grades for cops on so many occasions, I'm unsubscribing.

Comments are closed.