Deland Police TRAMPLE the constitution! #cops #blueline #policegames

Deland Police TRAMPLE the constitution! #cops #blueline #policegames

https://www.facebook.com/delandpd?mibextid=LQQJ4d

** (Disclaimer: This video content is intended for educational and informational purposes only) **

Author: phillynews215

HOSTING BY PHILLYFINESTSERVERSTAT | ANGELHOUSE © 2009 - 2024 | ALL YOUTUBE VIDEOS IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF GOOGLE INC. THE YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND BLOG FEEDS IS MANAGED BY THERE RIGHTFUL OWNERS. POST QUESTION OR INQUIRIES SEND ME AN EMAIL TO PHILLYNEWSNOW215@GMAIL.COM (www.phillynewsnow.com)

36 thoughts on “Deland Police TRAMPLE the constitution! #cops #blueline #policegames

  1. What amazes me is that the police will stand there with a straight face and say that they love the country and they follow the Constitution and we as citizens should trust and respect the police?? After seeing the signs on their walls I think of them the same way I do my communist neighbor.

  2. Man, Florida has straight gone to the toilet in the last several years. I don’t know how they are going to be able to keep this up. So many lawsuits against the state and already the state doesn’t have any money.

  3. It is common for First Amendment auditors to claim that they have a First Amendment right to film in a government building because it is open to the public (or in some cases, simply because it is owned by the government). However, the fact that an area is held open to the public is not sufficient to establish it as a public forum for First Amendment purposes. The area must also be traditionally used for or expressly dedicated to expressive activity. The U.S. Supreme Court has explicitly stated that publicly owned or operated property “is not transformed into ‘public forum’ property merely because the public is permitted to freely enter and leave the grounds at practically all times and the public is admitted to the building during specified hours.” United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171, 178 (1983).

    The Supreme Court has been clear that the government is able to impose reasonable limitations on public expression to preserve the government’s intended use for a particular space. A recent decision from the North Carolina Court of Appeals reflects this principle. In State v. Barber, 281 N.C. App. 99 (2021), the Court of Appeals held that the interior of the North Carolina General Assembly is not “an unlimited public forum” for purposes of First Amendment activity. Even though “citizens are free to visit the General Assembly and communicate with members and staff,” the court found that “the government may prohibit…conduct on a content-neutral basis that would affect the ability of members and staff to carry on legislative functions.”

    Outside of North Carolina, multiple courts have found areas of government property open to the public to be nonpublic forums. For example, the Supreme Court has held that the terminals of a publicly owned airport are nonpublic forums for First Amendment purposes. Likewise, a court has held the interior of the United States Capitol to be a nonpublic forum, despite the fact that Congress allows the public to observe its proceedings and visit the inside of the Capitol. As discussed in Section IV of the bulletin, a number of courts have found publicly accessible lobby areas of government buildings to be nonpublic forums. Other courts have even held certain publicly accessible outdoor areas to be nonpublic forums, including open-air plazas connected to government-owned buildings, areas outside of sports arenas, and sidewalks connected to government buildings. Public access, in and of itself, does not make an area a public forum.

Leave a Reply